At the end of the 1960s under the politically active left discussed the theory of state monopoly capitalism, where the interaction of the state with the economy became so intertwined, that it ultimately leads a domination of a financial oligarchy.There are two fundamentally different philosophies about the role of the State. The “left” utopia state as an all-encompassing big brother, meddling in everything and regulating everything. This was in the 20. Century tried several times, in extreme socialism of Soviet and Maoist style. The state takes care of everything, from the education of the children on the health care to the care of the elderly. The state includes all companies ( “StaMoKap” = state monopoly capitalists), workers, farmers, everyone is employed by the State. The State shall inform the people to their homes, it determines the clothing and fashion. The comprehensive monitoring of the population is only a by-product, the big brother would finally know everything, what his people will do so.
The proponents of the theory have been mostly communists at that time and frequently practicing “elite” today on behalf of big interests like the Stamokap-Marxist Trittin. Today it is clear to me why the representatives of this theory were considered so dangerous – the crisis shows that these structures really are dangerous.
In addition, the Stamokap theory assumes that we are in the final phase of capitalism, which becomes more and more likely. All freedom-minded people can only hope that the prophecy of the theory does not occur.
The Stamokap-Analysis of Lenin is based on several key messages for the Stamokap phase of imperialism. These are mainly the following:
- The Stamokap is a historical phase of the late capitalism, by special economic and political characteristics. What the economic side, this has been in every industry a small number of large companies play an important role. The large companies in a contradictory relationship between competition and cooperation between, had had a huge market power and economies of scale, as well as their due to their monopoly character crucial ROI benefits compared to other smaller companies. The centralization and the concentration of capital and production were to continue at higher levels – hours on one hand, the great mergers and acquisitions of the presence, on the other hand, the annual bankruptcy from small- and medium-sized enterprises.
- In political terms, State intervention in capitalism (and vice versa) characteristic for the Stamokap. This regulation is characterised by State tax policy, subsidies, investment, redistribution, social transfers, saving banks etc. it could be achieved by this state influences, the contradiction between social production and capitalist appropriation could be defuse. Last but not least the concern of the state is always for an acceleration of capitalist accumulation within the finance sector, for redistribution from the bottom up, and for the reproduction of the entire monopolist capitalist system.
- The economic impact of large companies has an impact in the political sphere. Connections to the State, the companies and banks measures the direction of the steer and influence policy in favor of their interests.
- The economic impact of large companies has an impact in the political sphere. Connections to the State, the companies and measures the direction of the steer and influence policy in favor of their interests. This interference by successes (for example Federation), mutual exchanges of staff between economy and politics, as well as institutionalised alliances (for example, “Social Partnership” ). Ultimately, the imperialist ideals, in the service of the monopolies.
In Stamokap capitalist contradictions were not solved, but just obfuscated. The gap between poor and rich people will be greater, the contradiction between social production and capitalist appropriation will remain unchanged. As well as causing an increase is inevitably reflected the contradiction between the “developed” industrialized countries of the center (v. a. United States, EU and Japan) and the neo-colonial style exploited them in countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America and European peripheral regions. There is also a contradiction between the last individual imperialist states are in constant battle for spheres of influence, raw materials, markets and cheap labor. These contradictions were the ones who needed to remove the state repression are still present and, above all, the military power had to lead. In the last instance, oppression, militarism and war as violence inherent in the Stamokap – in whatever form – its Clearing House Mechanism will remain. - The high level social, although monopolized production potential in the Stamokap way to socialism. It is important to make the production under social control as well as the state and the holdings to be made more democratic. A radically-democratic movement here in the framework of the Civil State should first reach the stage of the anti-monopoly democracy, the passing point and a prerequisite for the socialist society. Lenin writes, the “Dialectic of history is just that … the conversion of the monopolistic capitalism in the state monopoly capitalism …. extraordinarily close has brought humanity to the socialism.” ( Lenin- , Vol. 25, p. 370).
Whatever the case, the Stamokap is where they have always wanted to go there, the always presenting scape goats to blame. These measures were always there like Eurorettung®. If you’re not want to wake up in a rogue state® p, you must be vigilant and not be allowed to sleep and to do something against the protagonists of the state monopoly capitalism of the EU, EZB and G&S. The general election in German is no longer far away. The tax policy of the block parties in Germany and the EU is looming. The Stamokap make excellent progress. However, now some companies several states. Perhaps it is also a reason why the trend in the direction of ‘United States of Europe’ because it is more efficient for Goldman Sachs. They have only only one Stamokap tax collector for the EU and international major banks. Destroying family and democracy is an old agenda item of those. Wit new tax plans in Germany it will be implemented. A Single with a per capita income of $8000 pays to $1500 annual more . A family with 8000 Euros feeding four pays 4500 euros more per family head. It is only about the objective, to break the fundamental nucleus of society, the family. If the marriage is no longer the shelter to build a family, why should one get married? And societies, of which this well-fortified cells are missing are easy to steer politically. The NSA, the Euro, the ESM are all steps toward Stamokap led by Big Money.